Tag Archives: Industry

Study: Automotive Debt Is Out of Control, You’re Being Swindled

<img data-attachment-id=”1678584″ data-permalink=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2019/06/ask-bark-did-i-throw-away-the-key-to-a-new-car/shutterstock_731078407/” data-orig-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-5.jpg” data-orig-size=”1000,667″ data-comments-opened=”1″ data-image-meta=”{“aperture”:”0″,”credit”:””,”camera”:””,”caption”:””,”created_timestamp”:”0″,”copyright”:””,”focal_length”:”0″,”iso”:”0″,”shutter_speed”:”0″,”title”:””,”orientation”:”0″}” data-image-title=”inflatable tube man wacky waving style dealer lot” data-image-description=”

Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock

” data-medium-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-2.jpg” data-large-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1678584″ src=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”407″ srcset=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg 610w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-1.jpg 75w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-2.jpg 450w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-3.jpg 768w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-4.jpg 120w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-5.jpg 1000w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

Consumer Reports just released the findings of a year-long study looking into the latest trends in automotive loans and car payments. The resulting information highlights just how explosive the debt growth has been over the last 10 years and the arbitrary way in which borrowers are now being treated.

Long story short, we’re all being swindled.

With vehicle prices ballooning and the associated loans becoming longer than ever, dealers and lenders seem to be operating whatever way yields the steepest profit margins with only a modicum of consideration being given to the established frameworks designed to act as a guard rail. This has led to U.S. citizens carrying around a record $1.37 trillion in automotive load debt and customers with good credit being treated no different than those that fall into the subprime category. Sadly, the issue appears only appears to be worsening as new economic perils are only making things more expensive. Meanwhile, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is projecting national auto debt to swell to $1.42 trillion by year’s end. 

For the sake of comparison, Americans were only on the hook for $710 billion going into 2011. But the amount of debt being hauled behind us is only part of the story. Consumer Reports has used the study to assert that vehicles are eating up an increasingly large share of household incomes, citing nearly 858,000 loans from 17 major auto lenders.

From CR:

Today, Americans with new-car loans make an average monthly payment approaching $600 — up roughly 25 percent from a decade ago.

Most borrowers pay their loan with no problem. But in recent years, tens of thousands of consumers have found themselves in financial sinkholes after receiving high-interest, longer-term auto loans that, like the Maryland resident, put them at serious risk of default, CR’s investigation found.

This is happening as total auto loan debt held by Americans has increased dramatically over the past 10 years, surpassing $1.4 trillion — more than the gross domestic product of Australia. Because of recently skyrocketing prices for new and used cars, that debt is likely to grow even more.

“You’re not helping somebody to get a car if the odds are they’re going to lose it,” says Kathleen Engel, research professor at Suffolk University Law School in Boston who studies subprime financial products and is also the vice chair of CR’s board of directors. “That’s not getting somebody a car. That’s taking their money.”

Worse yet is that it’s not unheard of to see APRs surpassing 25 percent and lenders don’t seem to care who the customer is. While credit scores were invented back in the 1950s, under the auspices of delivering a standardized and impartial way of determining the creditworthiness of individual customers, the FICO score system used today didn’t appear until 1989. But it’s often been accused of allowing lenders to enact predatory stipulations on loans going to those with less-than-desirable numbers, particularly as the system has seen broader use.

Credit scores no longer apply exclusively to mortgage applications and loans. They’re now being included as part of some rental agreements and even job applications. It’s gotten to the point where we’ve begun to see pushback, often with claims that scoring doesn’t accurately represent debt risk and functionally serves to keep certain individuals from achieving upward mobility. While we’re not going to be diving into that, CR has asserted that the arbitrary nature of credit scoring has become a serious issue.

The outlet suggested that dealers and lenders are setting interest rates based upon something other than the standard loan underwriting practices. Instead, they’re conducting business in whatever manner “they think they can get away with” because many borrowers have no idea that they can (and should) negotiate terms or pit lenders/dealers against each other in hopes of getting a better bargain. Some of this is down to the legal and regulatory disparities between states. Though the outcome is the issue of focus because it’s in danger of permanently upending the economy when a meaningful percentage of the population can no longer afford to drive:

For one thing, it makes it harder to build the savings needed to purchase a car outright, says Pamela Foohey, a professor at the Cardozo School of Law in New York City who has published several studies on auto lending. Longer-term car loans — the average is now about six years — compound the problem, she says, trapping people in debt to fund a necessity like transportation.

“The trap for consumers, of course, is a boon to lenders,” Foohey says.

Falling behind on car payments can lead to repossession, triggering a cascade of other problems.

Lana Ash of Oklahoma and Dennis Lamar of Connecticut both had their vehicles repossessed last year in the middle of the pandemic, after getting stuck with high-APR car loans that proved to be more expensive than they could afford. Without a car, Lamar had to bum rides to doctors’ appointments. Ash had to take out another loan to fix a busted transmission on an old car.

“To this day, I still get emotional and upset about it,” Ash says.

Many Americans have faced similar outcomes. By spring 2021, an estimated 1 in 12 people with a car loan or lease, or almost 8 million Americans, were more than 90 days late on their car payments, according to a CR analysis of data from the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Philadelphia.

The resulting scenario has left us with a non-comparative automotive market where big businesses and banks can more effectively take advantage of their own customers. CR claimed that 46 percent of the 800,000+ loans reviewed were underwater, with owners owing $3,700 more (on average) than what the vehicle was actually worth. But we’re still just scratching the surface on how dark this is all becoming.

Consumer Reports utilized information disclosed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2019 and 2020 to investors of auto loan bonds, rounding out its research pool with thousands of pages of regulatory filings, court records, trade publications, industry reports, financial records, public documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, and interviews with more than 90 federal and state regulators, advocacy organizations, consumers, lawyers, legal experts, academics, and industry groups.

That data led to a few realizations, starting with the fact that your credit score is largely arbitrary when it comes to how vicious your auto loan is going to be. While there was a prevalence of individuals with scores exceeding 720 to receive better terms, literally everyone (including subprime borrowers) was subjected to APRs ranging between zero and 25 percent. CR likewise worried that lenders were intentionally putting customers into loans they couldn’t possibly afford, with over half of all subprime borrowers getting stuck with payments that were higher than 10 percent of their annual income. But almost none of the lenders bothered to check up on that, resulting in 96 percent of all auto loans going to people who never had their income verified.

This has likewise resulted in a surge of delinquencies over the last few years and a staggering increase in the amount of debt being carried around by Americans. But perhaps most alarming is how nobody seems interested in adhering to the underwriting practices that were supposedly put into place to keep things running smoothly in the fairest possible manner. Credit scores seem to be used to punish the subprime market without really offering much protection to those with good scores.

Consumer Reports said that it reached out to all 17 lenders covered in the analysis, in addition to industry groups like the American Financial Services Association and the National Automotive Finance Association. Some opted not to respond, with everyone declining to answer every question posed. Most also made assertions that consumers have the ability to make informed decisions for themselves and that there’s a wealth of information online for those interested.

Industry groups and financial institutions likewise claimed that auto lending was sufficiently regulated in the United States, suggesting that CR research failed to “contain enough information to accurately compare the loans similarly situated borrowers received.” Double-digit interest rates were dismissed as anomalies while the increased number of delinquencies and repossessions were dismissed entirely as they saw themselves as the only way for some customers to get vehicular loans.

“Consumers understand that rates will vary from creditor to creditor,” said Ed McFadden, a spokesperson for the American Financial Services Association. “They have ample opportunity to research and shop.”

Considering extended loan terms and a slightly higher interest rate can effectively add thousands onto even a modestly priced vehicle, it’s not difficult to see why CR is so critical of modern lending practices. There’s really no other way to spin this. Consumers are either morons, unworthy of being cut fairer deals, or financial institutions (and the dealership intermediaries) are predatory assholes that never seem to assume responsibility for their actions. And it’s all going to continue to be exacerbated as vehicle prices increase and automakers attempt to shift toward a direct sales model that further nullifies customers’ ability to negotiate payments.

This is like how modern safety requirements technically make it borderline impossible for new manufacturers to exist or any of my other anti-regulatory rants. CR has identified several industries working together to use the existing principles in whatever way yields them the most money. If you have some spare time, I highly suggest reading the entire report and inspecting the relevant investigative materials. It’s quite good, loaded with specific examples of the aforementioned problems, and written by Ryan Felton — who is adept at putting together these kinds of stories.

[Image: Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.


Could Ford’s Electric Fleet Sales Be Slower Than Expected?

<img data-attachment-id=”1776894″ data-permalink=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected/rouge-electric-vehicle-center/” data-orig-file=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Ford-Rouge-Electric-Vehicle-Center_20.jpg” data-orig-size=”7922,5281″ data-comments-opened=”1″ data-image-meta=”{“aperture”:”18″,”credit”:””,”camera”:”NIKON D850″,”caption”:”One year after Ford confirmed construction of the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, Mich., the first Ford F-150 Lightning pre-production units begin leaving the factory. Pre-production model shown. F-150 Lightning available starting spring 2022.”,”created_timestamp”:”1631073600″,”copyright”:””,”focal_length”:”52″,”iso”:”3200″,”shutter_speed”:”0.00625″,”title”:”Rouge Electric Vehicle Center”,”orientation”:”1″}” data-image-title=”Rouge Electric Vehicle Center” data-image-description=”

Ford Motor Co

” data-medium-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected-4.jpg” data-large-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1776894″ src=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”407″ srcset=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected.jpg 610w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected-3.jpg 75w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected-4.jpg 450w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected-5.jpg 768w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/could-fords-electric-fleet-sales-be-slower-than-expected-6.jpg 120w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

Despite most automakers proudly proclaiming their intention to shift toward EV-dominant portfolios, customers haven’t been sharing their enthusiasm. While there’s a subset of loyal early adopters that are eager to see electrification become the norm, the relative infancy of the technology and prevalent gaps in the charging infrastructure has kept them from becoming a majority. But manufacturers seem to think it’s just a matter of time and that they’ll be able to make up the difference through fleet sales.

Advertised with lower than average operating costs and juicy subsidies being offered throughout the developed world, automakers have convinced themselves that EVs will soon become the de facto rides for various entities needing to round out their stables. Meanwhile, we’re hearing inklings that Ford is seeing pushback from fleet customers over its s new F-150 Lightning pickup and E-Transit van. 

Blue Oval believes that its new vehicles, combined with an updated version of its fleet management suite prioritizing telematics and data accumulation, will result in a glut of customers interested in having more direct control over their commercial armadas. The fact that they’ll also be EVs is supposed to make them further appetizing, due to government incentives and the fact that they won’t require fueling.

“[The Lightning and E-Transit] are targeted at real people doing real work,” Ted Cannis, chief executive of Ford Pro, stated at Reuters’ recent Automotive Summit.

From Reuters:

But some of those potential fleet buyers are taking a “wait and see” attitude, partly from a lack of experience with electric vehicles and partly from a lack of clarity on government policy and regulations around EVs.

Those are not insurmountable obstacles over the longer term, according to Cannis, who told Reuters:

“In the U.S., we see 70 [percent] of the full-size bus and van industry going electric by 2030. That’s more than 300,000 vehicles annually. And we expect a third of the full-size pickup (market) to go all-electric by 2030, which is more than 800,000 vehicles annually.”

With electric work trucks and vans, Cannis said, fleet customers can save money on fuel, maintenance and repairs, “but there is still a fear of the unknown” about EVs among both employees and managers.

Perhaps by 2030, the necessary infrastructure will be in place to facilitate widespread EV adoption and they’ll have reached financial parity with internal combustion vehicles. But electrics currently require more advanced planning to get the most out of their powertrains and you have to pay more for them upfront to save money over time. Some of the fleet managers we’ve spoken to said they’ve had difficulties figuring out how to make EVs work for their businesses. Concerns have also been expressed about their lackluster resale values, the potential for charging downtime, and how much money would need to be spent to replace a battery system. Though the latter issue isn’t likely to come up considering how short most fleet cycles happen to be.

On the other hand, managers were almost universally interested in the government incentives being promoted by the Biden administration and wondered if the changing regulatory landscape might make soon make EVs a necessary addition to their garages. Governor Gavin Newsom has repeatedly said that California will gradually phase out internal combustion vehicles and may even begin prohibiting diesel trucks from utilizing certain roadways in a bid to reduce pollution. Many other states are politically aligned with California and are likely to follow its lead. These are considerations business owners are preoccupied with. But there’s no concrete legislation at play to make any of the above a guarantee and the free market (or what’s left of it) isn’t quite ready to place EVs on a pedestal.

Cannis seems undaunted, however. He’s claiming that everyone who has driven the all-electric F-Series believes it to be the most exciting full-sized pickup Ford has produced, pointing to the 150,000 preorders as evidence.

It’s actually more than the automaker can realistically manufacture. In August, Blue Oval doubled its production target to 80,000 Lightings annually as a way to meet demand. But that capacity isn’t supposed to be achieved until 2024 and the model launches in 2022. Frankly, with the pickup obviously exceeding projections before anyone has had an opportunity to really shake one down (Ford has allowed a few high-profile influencers and Joe Biden to drive the prototype), it’s strange that the head of Ford’s commercial fleet division would even bother to mention that the company has been getting pushback from customers.

Our guess is that certain types of businesses just don’t see EVs as feasible right now. We noticed receptiveness varied heavily based upon what kind of work fleet managers needed vehicles to do. Localized fleets focused on precise routes with predictable downtimes are ideal for electrification. But long-haulers taking varied routes have less use for EVs and far fewer options to realistically choose from.

The U.S. government has also faced difficulties meeting the Biden administration’s ambitious goal to electrify the entire federal fleet. For starters, many government rides (particularly those used by the USPS) boast some of the longest lifespans of any fleet vehicles you’re likely to encounter. That adds meaningful financial risks if they select the wrong product just to spur on EV adoption.

The current federal fleet encompasses about 657,000 vehicles in total. However, agencies had only purchased about 500 zero-emissions vehicles through August of 2021, and data from the General Services Administration (GSA) currently cites EVs as comprising less than 1 percent of the whole. The transition has progressed slowly, with officials citing supply issues and difficulties choosing the right vehicles for various departments as the biggest obstacles.

“The opportunities are clear, but first we need to acknowledge that we are starting from a low baseline,” White House national climate adviser Gina McCarthy said during June’s GSA FedFleet Conference. “I want to thank the thousands of fleet management professionals leading this charge and demonstrating our leadership and commitment to winning the future. The many agencies that will work together to achieve our goals exemplify the whole-of-government approach to tackling the climate crisis.”

With the sheer amount of marketing materials out there promoting electrification and encouraging businesses to establish EV-focused fleets, it’s often difficult to get a genuine sense of how things are actually progressing. Ford says the Lightning is already exceeding expectations. But the head of Ford Pro said customers were expressing hesitancy. The federal government is dead set on replacing combustion vehicles with EVs. But it has failed to put more than 500 units onto the road. Manufacturers are promoting electric cars at every turn. But pure electrics still make up a minuscule share of what’s actually being sold to customers.

It hasn’t done much to assuage my skepticism going into 2022. But 2030 should provide plug-ins with sufficient time to continue maturing. Considering how much better EVs have gotten over the last decade, future EVs should be capable of handling new challenges and giving internal combustion cars a run for their money. Or they could fail to see the necessary infrastructure and technology develop and end up like autonomous driving — another unfulfilled industrial promise.

[Images: Ford Motor Co.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Toyota check out Premier Toyota of Amherst TODAY!

Lucid Motors Becomes an Automaker

<img data-attachment-id=”1775086″ data-permalink=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker/lucid-air-pre-delivery-inspection/” data-orig-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-6.jpg” data-orig-size=”1600,1067″ data-comments-opened=”1″ data-image-meta=”{“aperture”:”0″,”credit”:””,”camera”:””,”caption”:””,”created_timestamp”:”0″,”copyright”:””,”focal_length”:”0″,”iso”:”0″,”shutter_speed”:”0″,”title”:””,”orientation”:”0″}” data-image-title=”lucid-air-pre-delivery-inspection” data-image-description=”

Lucid Motors

” data-medium-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-3.jpg” data-large-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1775086″ src=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”407″ srcset=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker.jpg 610w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-2.jpg 75w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-3.jpg 450w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-4.jpg 768w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-5.jpg 120w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-6.jpg 1600w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

Production of the 2022 Lucid Air started this week, adding another automaker to the North American roster. The manufacturer held an event on September 28th, inviting Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, relevant executives, big-time investors, select media outlets, and customers who dropped $170,000 to purchase the limited Dream Edition of the electric vehicle.

While often framed as a Tesla ripoff, Lucid Motors has been setting its sights so high that it hardly feels like a fair assessment. Because the Air is offering one of the most impressive all-electric spec sheets in the industry right now and should probably worry the competition.

“The proprietary EV technology that Lucid has developed will make it possible to travel more miles using less battery energy. For example, our Lucid Air Grand Touring has an official EPA rating of 516 miles of range with a 112-kWh battery pack, giving it an industry-leading efficiency of 4.6 miles per kWh. Our technology will allow for increasingly lighter, more efficient, and less expensive EVs, and today represents a major step in our journey to expand the accessibility of more sustainable transportation,” Peter Rawlinson, CEO and CTO of Lucid Group, said at the event. “I’m delighted that production cars endowed with this level of efficiency are currently driving off our factory line.”

With manufacturing duties split between the Advanced Manufacturing Plant (AMP-1) and nearby Lucid Powertrain Manufacturing (LPM-1), the company thinks it should be able to commence deliveries in October. However, that will be limited to the 520 all-wheel-drive Dream Edition cars people paid extra for. The Range variant offers 520 miles on a single charge while the Performance model is said to offer an operating area of 451 miles and enough horsepower to breeze through a quarter-mile in 9.9 seconds at 144 mph.

Next on the production docket will be the 800-hp Lucid Air Grand Touring ($139,000).

Lucid said it currently has around 13,000 reservation holders, though its survival will hinge on its sales performance after those deliveries are handled and it has to focus on base (which will be rear-drive only) and mid-trimmed cars. While the manufacturer has said those models won’t have the same charging capacities as cars boasting higher MSRPs, everything is supposed to yield a maximum range in excess of 400 miles and retain DC fast-charging capability. Customers will also get three full years of free access to Electrify America charging stations.

All in all, it’s sounding quite good for Lucid. But we’ll have to wait and see if it can maintain momentum and reach the same heights that Tesla has. Lucid Motors has made some bold assertions about the future and it could be undone if has to break a bunch of promises regarding the lesser trims or quality control becomes an issue. This is a brand-new automaker, after all.

But things are looking up for the time being and the company is even considering subsequent vehicles. AMP-1 is supposed to begin production of an all-electric SUV using much of the same technology that’s gone into the Air. Its launch has tentatively been scheduled for sometime in 2023.

<img data-attachment-id=”1775088″ data-permalink=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker/lucid-air-delivery-update-hero/” data-orig-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-11.jpg” data-orig-size=”1600,1067″ data-comments-opened=”1″ data-image-meta=”{“aperture”:”0″,”credit”:””,”camera”:””,”caption”:””,”created_timestamp”:”0″,”copyright”:””,”focal_length”:”0″,”iso”:”0″,”shutter_speed”:”0″,”title”:””,”orientation”:”0″}” data-image-title=”lucid-air-delivery-update-hero” data-image-description=”

Lucid Motors

” data-medium-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-8.jpg” data-large-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-1.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1775088″ src=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-1.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”407″ srcset=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-1.jpg 610w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-7.jpg 75w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-8.jpg 450w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-9.jpg 768w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-10.jpg 120w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/lucid-motors-becomes-an-automaker-11.jpg 1600w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

[Images: Lucid Motors]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

For GREAT deals on a new or used INFINITI check out INFINITI of Ontario TODAY!

Vaccine Mandates Being Considered By Auto Industry, UAW

<img data-attachment-id=”1773672″ data-permalink=”https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw/covid-19vaccinationrecordcardsissuedbycdcunitedstatescenters/” data-orig-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-5.jpg” data-orig-size=”1000,667″ data-comments-opened=”1″ data-image-meta=”{“aperture”:”0″,”credit”:”Shutterstock”,”camera”:””,”caption”:””,”created_timestamp”:”0″,”copyright”:”Copyright (c) 2021 Michael Vi\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.”,”focal_length”:”0″,”iso”:”0″,”shutter_speed”:”0″,”title”:”Covid-19,Vaccination,Record,Cards,Issued,By,Cdc,(united,States,Centers”,”orientation”:”1″}” data-image-title=”Covid-19,Vaccination,Record,Cards,Issued,By,Cdc,(united,States,Centers” data-image-description=”

Michael Vi/Shutterstock

” data-medium-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-2.jpg” data-large-file=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-1773672″ src=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg” alt width=”610″ height=”407″ srcset=”http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg 610w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-1.jpg 75w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-2.jpg 450w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-3.jpg 768w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-4.jpg 120w, http://automotivezen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-5.jpg 1000w” sizes=”(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px”>

With the Biden administration having announced that it would start requiring companies to vaccinate employees, automakers and UAW are finding themselves in a sticky situation. Unions had previously said they wanted to hold off on endorsing or opposing mandatory vaccinations until after they discussed things with the industry and their own members. Considering Joe Biden said he wouldn’t make vaccines mandatory less than 10 months ago, employers are getting caught with their pants around the proverbial ankles.

Automakers had previously been surveying white-collar workers to see what they wanted to do while upping on-site COVID restrictions, but operating under the impression that any hard decisions were likely a long way off and left entirely to their discretion. Now the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration is planning a new standard that requires all employers with 100 (or more) employees to guarantee their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any unvaccinated workers to produce a negative test result on a minimum weekly basis. 

Employers that fail to implement the stated requirements could face fines of nearly $14,000 per violation, according to the White House, with penalties also doubling for those who refuse to wear masks during interstate travel. Those are potentially steep fees when you’re employees number in the thousands. Union officials have said they’re considering the matter without committing to more than absolutely necessary — though the UAW officially opposed vaccine requirements in the past.

From UAW President Ray Curry:

“The UAW has and continues to strongly encourage all members and their families to be vaccinated unless there is specific health or religious concerns. We know that this is the best way to protect our members, coworkers and their families.

We are reviewing the details of yesterday’s announcements and the impact on our members and our over 700 employer contracts.

In the meantime, we continue our member commitment to practice safety in every one of our worksites by following protocols including masks, sanitizing and reporting any exposure or symptoms of the virus. At the UAW we all understand that fighting this pandemic and protecting our families is key to our survival.”

Assuming the union ultimately decides to endorse the vaccine decree, it’s likely going to be fracturing its membership. While I am hardly against vaccinations, I strongly support informed consent and speaking candidly about this has resulted in autoworkers frequently confessing they’re similarly opposed to forced vaccinations. Many have said they would immediately quit their jobs, matching a recent Washington Post poll claiming 70 percent of unvaccinated workers would simply abandon their positions if vaccine mandates are instituted. It’s my assumption that the industry will have a sudden, catastrophic staffing shortage were it to move forward with the Biden plan.

Automakers have been similarly noncommittal, with manufacturers (including Ford, GM, Stellantis, Honda, and Toyota) stating they encourage staff to get vaccinated and want to adhere to all government-issued health protocols. But they typically steer clear of addressing the Biden plan directly, possibly indicating some hesitancy. That said, it hasn’t even been a full day since the vaccine mandate was announced and their HR and legal departments are probably wringing their hands as they ponder upon what’s to be done and the fallout it might create.

Every statement automakers have been willing to make thus far can be paraphrased into “hold on … we’ve got to think about this,” followed by a paragraph about how they believe in vaccinations and want to adhere to recommendations coming from the relevant health experts. Conversely, very little has been said about the rights or preferences of their employees.

I’m not going to beat around this bush. The entire premise of these mandates seems insane to me, bordering on wicked. As an American, I always thought the whole premise of the country was predicated upon the shared belief that personal liberties and freedom of choice trump everything else. But that doesn’t seem to be what’s coming down from the top anymore. The rhetoric being used by Joe Biden is egregiously confrontational, including statements like “we’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin” as he made sweeping assertions about how the unvaccinated are stifling national unity and progress. He also confusingly stated that vaccinated workers need to be “protected” from the unvaccinated.

Assuming vaccines are effective, shouldn’t it be the other way round? What exactly are we shielding people from when new strains continue to manifest, can still be spread amongst the vaccinated, and the shots we currently have are targeting older COVID variants that have lost steam?

The economic and social stress this is likely to place upon the industry and country as a whole will be nothing short of monumental. Protests have been erupting across the globe all summer. Truckers have started organizing in numerous countries and have refused to deliver to areas imposing strict COVID rules, exacerbating food shortages in urban areas. In the United States, the same was true for cities that opted to defund police departments. Now they’re starting to talk about strikes focused on vaccine and mask mandates while they’re already experiencing a severe shortage of drivers. Imagine if that spills over to an automotive sector that’s already been beleaguered by the semiconductor shortage, their suppliers, and every other industry you rely on.

[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Got a traffic ticket? If you’re looking to mask your ticket through a DMV licensed California traffic school check out Fast Course 4 Less. They have a money back and low price guarantee with courses available 24/7 starting at $19.95!

For GREAT deals on used vehicles check out Overstock Vehicles TODAY!

Will Tesla Expand in China, Or Head the Export Route?

Image: Tesla

What does the future hold for Tesla in China? Expansion, or exports?

That’s the question being asked by an Automotive News story today.

Earlier this year, the outlook for Tesla in China looked rosy. But net orders for cars have fallen by nearly half this quarter amid concerns about the company’s vehicle safety, along with how it collects and stores data, and at least one report suggests that the company could end up exporting cars produced in China to Europe.

Not long ago, analysts were predicting expansion for Tesla in China. One analyst mentioned that in addition to planned plants in Texas and Berlin, Tesla could build another factory in China.

China’s Passenger Car Association will release May’s sales data next week. Sales dropped more than 25 percent from March to April, with more than half of the over 25,000 cars produced in China being exported.

Tesla stock did rise a bit in Friday’s early trading after a slight fall on Thursday, though the stock is down 35 percent from its peak in January.

For reference, China is the second-biggest market for Tesla, following the U.S. It builds Model 3 and Model Y vehicles in Shanghai.

Like the analysts, we too are curious about what happens. Tesla appears to be at a crossroads in China — if expansion was in the cards, it would obviously be great news for Elon Musk and company. Not just because growth is generally good, but because China is obviously a huge market. The country’s EV market is arguably more competitive than here, thanks to the presence of both several startups and more traditional automakers like BYD that build EVs, with roughly 20 makes in play, but Tesla shipped a half-million units there in 2020.

Obviously, the company would prefer to sell Chinese-made Teslas in China instead of shipping them to other markets. But the company has been dealing with a series of headaches for quite some time now. Between concerns about reliability here in the States and the ability of Teslas equipped with autonomous-driving software to perform those functions in a safe manner, and concerns about data, Tesla has enough headaches to make Musk want to take some time off to host a comedy show. Oh, wait.

All this would seem to confirm earlier reports that we highlighted regarding canceled expansion plans at the Shanghai plant.

At the moment, it sure looks like contraction, rather than expansion, is the name of Tesla’s China game.

[Image: Tesla]

Toyota’s Akio Toyota Chosen 2021 World Car Person of the Year

Toyoda

Selected 2021 World Car Awards Person of the Year was Akio Toyoda, Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) president and CEO.

Toyoda

“Akio Toyoda is the charismatic President and CEO of Toyota Motor Corporation. He has spent years successfully remaking his company. In 2020 despite COVID-19, under his leadership Toyota remained profitable, protecting jobs worldwide. He has maintained Toyota’s steady pace of development in the connected, autonomous, shared and electric (CASE) era. He has also initiated construction of the Woven City, an exciting, real-life prototype city of the future. All while actively participating in motorsports himself, as a driver,” said the World Car Awards in a statement.

Toyoda said, “At Toyota, we are very fortunate that we were able to protect the employment of our team members during COVID-19 and continue our work to meet the future challenge of our industry. Creating new ways to support the well-being of our planet and people everywhere is our commitment. This has been a difficult period in the history of the world. But it has also reminded us that people are what matters most. And if we at Toyota can contribute some measure of happiness to their lives, it will be my never-ending goal to do just that.”

Toyoda

Toyota joined the company in 1984, after graduating with a law degree from Keio University. He also received a masters in business administration from Wellesley, Massachusetts’ Babson College. Toyoda served in different areas of the business in Japan and overseas, before becoming a member of the TMC board of directors in 2000. He held other senior and executive vice-presidential roles until becoming TMC president in 2009.

Toyoda The World Car Person of the Year award was established in 2018 to acknowledge the contributions made by an individual in the auto industry during the previous year. The World Car Awards program hands out six awards annually, which they started doing in 2003. A group of more than 90 journalists, none of whom are a part of TheTruthAboutCars.com, made the selection.

[Images: Toyota, Babson College]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out Envision CDJR West Covina TODAY!

Stellantis Laying off 150 Jeep Employees in Illinois

fca
Jeep is laying off 150 workers that would have otherwise been employed at its Belvidere Assembly Plant, which actually produces the Jeep Cherokee instead of the long defunct, full-size Plymouth. Based on the timing, this decision appears to have something to do with the FCA-PSA Group merger that formed Stellantis.

We’re only able to guess the core reasoning. With FCA having abandoned monthly reporting for quarterly, allegedly as a way to promote transparency, we don’t actually know how the Cherokee is performing on the market. It’s something the Detroit Free Press also noted when it broke the story.

While last year’s domestic volume of 135,855 represents a sizable decline from 2019, it wasn’t a typical year where you could say that was indicative of anything more than there being a pandemic that forced a lot of dealerships to close shop or operate under heavy restrictions.

“The Stellantis plant in Belvidere, Illinois, is rebalancing its staffing levels as it realigns production to meet global demand for the Jeep Cherokee. Following a review of its operations, 150 people will be indefinitely laid off, starting Feb. 20, 2021. The company will make every effort to place indefinitely laid off hourly employees in open full-time positions as they become available based on seniority,” according to a company statement issued by spokeswoman Jodi Tinson.

By contrast, we’ve heard nothing to suggest there will be any layoffs in Detroit related to the Grand Cherokee. But it didn’t have quite the sales slip that its little brother endured. Stellantis may simply have seen the Cherokee falling a little harder than the rest of the Jeep family while going over the books, and decided it wasn’t worth paying every single one of Belvidere’s 3,374 hourly and 206 salaried employees.

[Image :Stellantis/FCA]

Jim Farley is Allowed to Race, and The Detroit Free Press is Allowed to Write About It

Jim Farley. Image: Ford

Car Twitter is a weird, wonderful online “place”, but sometimes bad takes bubble up. And there’s a double-whammy of bad takery floating around this afternoon.

Take number one: Ford CEO Jim Farley is taking an unnecessary risk by racing cars that could hurt Ford should an accident leave him dead or too injured to work/lead the company, according to some experts interviewed by the Detroit Free Press for a story by Jamie LaReau.

Take number two: The Freep and/or Jamie are dumb for publishing/writing this article.

I do agree with the logic behind the arguments in favor of Farley racing, but that doesn’t make the Freep or LaReau dumb. It’s a reporter writing about what experts think. More on that in a sec.

The logic is this: Farley should be allowed to race because he’s a car guy and enthusiast and it’s arguably better to have a car enthusiast running a car company because a car enthusiast is more likely to understand a unique industry in which many purchase decisions are driven by emotion and/or if Ford is run by a car guy it means there will always be a place for performance cars in the company’s model lineup. Besides, the risk is low.

As I said above, in general, I agree with that, even though it’s not a given that a car guy will do a better job running a car company and/or keep performance cars alive. Just that it’s more likely. And racing today, even in vintage cars, is generally safe, although the risk of death and injury still does exist.

But to castigate the Freep for writing this story is a bit ridiculous.

There’s a “kill the messenger” critique of journalism that has existed for the past five years (and probably before that, but it’s been more noticeable since you-know-who and some of his partisan enablers took up arms against media that was fair and honest but critical). It’s not just relegated to politics — Elon Musk has rallied Tesla fanboys against media the same way, too.

In brief, this critique usually presents itself in one of two circumstances. Circumstance one: The subject of critical reporting deflects by accusing the outlet/journalist of bias and/or incompetence instead of addressing the criticism. Circumstance two: Journalist/outlet interviews a person/expert or multiple persons/experts, the reader doesn’t like what the interviewee(s) say, and instead of critiquing those who were interviewed and their claims, the reader moans that the outlet shouldn’t have published a story that dares to present an argument they don’t agree with — even if the outlet isn’t the one making the argument.

This is an example of the latter. What’s frustrating to me is that some of the annoyed Twitterati aren’t just car enthusiasts — they’re automotive journalists or people who work in the automotive media in some capacity.

In other words, people who should know better.

It would be one thing if LaReau was writing an opinion piece and got flayed for having a take that most people disagreed with. It’s an occupational hazard of writing op-eds. Y’all have flayed me a few times and that’s fine. You write an opinion column, you risk blowback.

But this is a feature story, not arguing either side. At least, LaReau doesn’t appear to be arguing either side — she quotes those who defend Farley’s racing, as well as those who think it’s not a good idea.

There’s also nothing in the piece that isn’t really true. Racing is risky, though far less so than it used to be. And none of the arguments from either side are way off-base. Regardless if you think Farley should race or not, all the arguments are valid.

To be clear, I am not defending LaReau for any personal reason — as small as this industry can be, I am not sure I’ve ever met her. I’d disclose if I knew her, or recuse myself from writing about this.

Has the discourse fallen this far? It’s bad enough that we flame each other, and cherry-pick facts, and fall for mis/disinformation, and that we’re often too tribal. Too often, people care more about “owning” and “destroying” someone in a discussion/debate to worry about being intellectually honest and reasonable.

All that makes for terrible discourse. And now we’re attacking writers and outlets for merely presenting an argument we mildly disagree with? Instead of attacking the argument itself?

This isn’t some free speech/First Amendment/cancel culture rant. The First Amendment doesn’t apply here, and there are some takes that do deserve to be shamed and scorned, and some takes that don’t deserve a platform (Holocaust denial comes to mind). I also think people are far too quick to scream “cancel culture” when someone gets deserved blowback for writing something truly terrible, especially if it’s bigoted in some way.

Obviously, tweeting out that the Freep shouldn’t have published this piece doesn’t rise to the level of screaming at some comic who said something transphobic or racist. But it’s still odd!

Why is so hard to argue that Farley should be allowed to race without suggesting the Freep shouldn’t publish a relatively harmless examination of how big companies insure CEOs who indulge in risky hobbies during their free time?

It’s actually an interesting dive into a part of the business I’ve never given much thought to before.

If you think some insurance experts (who, may I remind you, work for companies with a vested interest in NOT seeing their clients hurt pursuing risky fun during their off hours) are ninnies because they think it’s a bad idea for Farley to race, that’s fine.

Just don’t argue that the Freep can’t give those ninnies an interview because you’re such a ninny yourself that the mere suggestion that Farley hang up the Pilotis gives you the willies.

Yeah, that’s right. Don’t be a ninny.

[Image: Ford]

Could Next Toyota Land Cruiser, If There is One, Get a GR Trim?

The Toyota Land Cruiser is dead. Long live the Toyota Land Cruiser?

The saga of the Land Cruiser is getting confusing. First, we picked up on reporting from Motor Authority that suggested the LC will soon be sent to the great junkyard in the sky, although the Lexus version will soldier on. Part of that report suggested that there is a new generation for the Land Cruiser on the way, but perhaps not to be sold here.

Now Carscoops is reporting that Toyota has plans for a Gazoo Racing trim for the next Land Cruiser, although it doesn’t mention which markets might get the new Land Cruiser. It just speaks very generally about Toyota’s GR plans, quoting an Australian exec who vaguely leaves open the possibility that Toyota could give the LC the GR treatment.

From there, the post suggests that a GR LC would have enhanced off-road abilities and may or may not get a twin-turbo 4.0-liter V8.

If that seems like speculation based off of a quote and inferences based on other product plans, well, it is. It’s not exactly the same kind of reporting that leans on more concrete information, such as patents or a leak from a dealer meeting.

It’s a form of journalism that seems common to the Internet, and not just within automotive – sports fans will note that plenty of blogs get clicks by speculating on trades and free-agent moves, using vague rumors and interpretations of tweets.

This kind of journalism isn’t unethical or anything like that, but it’s not particularly informative, either. It’s basically a writer saying “I’ve heard this rumor, so this could happen, let me think it over in a blog post, and put it out there for the reader because he/she might find it interesting. And if people click to read the story, that’s a bonus.” It’s fun to let minds wander, but it doesn’t really prove much one way or another.

In this case, it doesn’t prove a GR Land Cruiser is on the way – just that there likely will be a next-gen Land Cruiser sold in at least some markets, and Toyota seems to be interested in giving many of its models GR trims (again, in some markets), and therefore it seems logical that Toyota might offer a GR Land Cruiser.

By the way, the small side lesson in journalism wasn’t a shot at Carscoops or anyone else – speculative wonderings aren’t uncommon when covering an industry whose future draws interest, whether it’s future cars in automotive or player movement in sports. We’ve done it, and by aggregating Carscoops, I am doing it now.

It’s merely a reminder that speculation is just that, and just because it seems logical that the Land Cruiser might get a GR trim in the future, it doesn’t mean it will.

We still don’t know if it will return to America in any form.

That said, if the idea of an off-road-prepped version of a redesigned Land Cruiser with turbo power intrigues you, you now have reason to daydream.

[Image: Toyota]

For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Nissan of Sumter TODAY!